Because of a lapse in government funding, the information on this website may not be up to date, transactions submitted via the website may not be processed, and the agency may not be able to respond to inquiries until appropriations are enacted.
The NIH Clinical Center (the research hospital of NIH) is open. For more details about its operating status, please visit https://cc.nih.gov.
Updates regarding government operating status and resumption of normal operations can be found at https://opm.gov.

Ante la falta de fondos del gobierno federal, no se actualizará este sitio web y la organización no responderá a transacciones ni consultas hasta que se aprueben los fondos.
 El Centro Clínico de los Institutos Nacionales de la Salud  (el hospital de investigación) permanecerá abierto. Consulte https://cc.nih.gov(en inglés)
Infórmese sobre el funcionamiento del gobierno federal y el reinicio de las actividades en https://opm.gov.

Year of Publication: 2023
Project: BOLD Connectivity Dynamics
FIM Authors:
Authors:
  • David Jangraw
  • Emily Finn
  • Peter Bandettini
  • Nicole Landi
  • Haorui Sun
  • Fumiko Hoeft
  • Gang Chen
  • Kenneth Pugh
  • Peter Molfese
Abstract: Recent work using fMRI inter-subject correlation analysis has provided new information about the brain's response to video and audio narratives, particularly in frontal regions not typically activated by single words. This approach is very well suited to the study of reading, where narrative is central to natural experience. But since past reading paradigms have primarily presented single words or phrases, the influence of narrative on semantic processing in the brain - and how that influence might change with reading ability - remains largely unexplored. In this study, we presented coherent stories to adolescents and young adults with a wide range of reading abilities. The stories were presented in alternating visual and auditory blocks. We used a dimensional inter-subject correlation analysis to identify regions in which better and worse readers had varying levels of consistency with other readers. This analysis identified a widespread set of brain regions in which activity timecourses were more similar among better readers than among worse readers. These differences were not detected with standard block activation analyses. Worse readers had higher correlation with better readers than with other worse readers, suggesting that the worse readers had 'idiosyncratic' responses rather than using a single compensatory mechanism. Close inspection confirmed that these differences were not explained by differences in IQ or motion. These results suggest an expansion of the current view of where and how reading ability is reflected in the brain, and in doing so, they establish inter-subject correlation as a sensitive tool for future studies of reading disorders.
Data
Code
Journal: NeuroImage
Volume: 282
URL:
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120390